AIA Australia has launched AIA Vitality, an innovative rewards program that can help to keep you healthy and cut your insurance life premiums. Thursday 17 september 2015. FREE. 118. pages of hot property open homes p184. FIND A TRADIE. p205. From millions of real job salary data. Average salary is Detailed starting salary, median salary, pay scale, bonus data report. We would like to show you a description here but the site wont allow us. UPDATED, 100 PM Asked by Deadline about whether the studios or other companies will be able to pull off Premium Video on Demand PVOD, NATO President and CEO John. Dick Hoyt ran his 31st Boston Marathon last week thinking it would be his last. But now the 72yearold father, who has pushed his disabled son in a special. Read the Latest and Breaking IT and Technology News, Reviews, Analysis Opinion for Australian IT managers and professionals. Win Competitions NetRewards, Free to enter Online Competitions The Latest and the Best Online Competitions, SMS Competitions, 25 Words or Less Competitions, Buy a. Watch State Property Online Hoyts Cinemas' title='Watch State Property Online Hoyts Cinemas' />Aust. LII Aust. LII Past Announcements. Search Legal Publishers. Use this new facility to search for documents on Legal publishers web sites. You can select Search Australian Legal Publishers from the list on the left. Legal Publishers from the right hand drop. Repeat search over. Legal Publishers. Sign up here for CCHs Daily Email Alert. Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana. Find the best SMS competitions at NetRewards to win great prizes. Its a free daily briefing of. Aust. LII thanks CCH for its generous support in making this new feature available to our users. Justice Lucy Mc. Callum is again taking bribes from Kerry Stokes and Channel Seven. NSW Supreme Court judge Lucy Mc. Callum is clearly back on the payroll of Kerry Stokes, Seven West Media and Addisons Lawyers. Justice Mc. Callum is close personal friends with Addisons Lawyers partner Justine Munsie who represents Kerry Stokes, Seven West Media and Channel 7. The prima facie case that Justice Mc. Callum has been taking bribes off Kerry Stokes and Seven West Media has been building over the last couple of years and reached a point where it is irrefutable. The latest installment by Justice Mc. Callum is that she is doing what she can to help Kerry Stokes and Seven get my computer or a copy of it and then refusing to publish written reasons for her judgment and court orders. This is the second time in my matters that Justice Mc. Crazy-Beautiful-You-2015.jpg' alt='Watch State Property Online Hoyts Movie' title='Watch State Property Online Hoyts Movie' />Callum has refused to publish written reasons in an attempt to cover her corrupt conduct and in effect allowing Seven a backdoor appeal. Im not the only one now reporting on the corruption and personal interest of judges in the NSW Supreme Court with many journalists publishing stories and tweeting about the close relationship Justice John Sackar has with Seven and their top lawyer Bruce Mc. William. From the Twitter account of the legal website. Watch State Property Online Hoyts NurseryJustinian And from Stephen Mayne I wrote last week It would be interesting for someone to count how many suppression orders Kerry Stokes, Seven and his other companies have taken out against people over the years because I have no doubt there would be dozens. As it turns out Stokes is also now suing the website New Matilda on top of his frivolous and vexatious cases against Simon Mulvany and myself. The list of. SLAPP lawsuitsby Stokes and Seven keeps on growing. Justice Mc. Callum secret hearing with Stokes lawyers in 2. Mc. Callum never published reasons Click here for a full copy of the transcriptJustice Mc. Callum has form on the board for having secret hearings with Kerry Stokes and Seven lawyers. They were caught out in 2. I had to buy the transcript to find out what happened as no one would tell me. Below is the email I sent Justice Mc. Callum and she refused to respond. From Shane Dowling. Sent 2. 9 May 2. To nicolesinclaircourts. Cc officehazzard. Subject Justice Lucy Mc. Callum Criminal Investigation Supreme Court of NSWDear Justice Mc. Callum. I hereby request that you answer the below questions in relation to the private communication that you had with Kerry Stokes via his lawyer and fellow applicant Justine Munsie and their barrister Sandy Dawson on 6th of May 2. You had the communication in the Supreme Court of NSW without my knowledge or consent in the matter Justine Munsie v Shane Dowling. As you are fully aware the private communication that you had with Mr Dawson in court on that day is a breach of the 2. Barristers Rules 5. These rules are not new. These rules were rules 5. Barristers Rule 2. They reflect what Gibbs CJ described in Re JRL Ex parte CJL as the fundamental principle that a judge must not hear evidence or receive representations from one side behind the back of the other. See https portal. Communications2. Court. It is also a breach of section 3. Crimes Act 1. 91. Watch Knick Knack Online Fandango. Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested given that you admitted that you knew Justine Munsie and then proceeded with your private communication and handed down a judgement in her favour. The relevant precedents are many such as A judge must not receive private communications from a party or the representatives of a party without the knowledge and consent of the other party R v Magistrates Court at Lilydale Ex parte Ciccone 1. VR 1. 22 Re JRL Ex parte CJL 1. CLR 3. 42. A judge must also maintain the appearance of impartiality and must not be in a situation where he or she could be suspected of having sought or received private communications from a party or a witness R v Magistrates Court at Lilydale Ex parte Ciccone 1. VR 1. 22 Haldane and Transexecutive Airlines Pty Ltd v Chegwidden 1. SASR 5. 46. See http www. ManualsVCPMindex. And An existing or previous association between the judge and a party to the proceedings may give rise to an apprehension of bias Re Polites Ex parte Hoyts Corporation 1. CLR 7. 8. If the judge believes that a relationship might give rise to an apprehension of bias, he or she should disclose that relationship in open court and invite the parties to make submissions on whether the judge is disqualified due to that relationship S M Motor Repairs v Caltex Oil 1. NSWLR 3. 58. It is not necessary for the judge to disclose a personal relationship if he or she is satisfied, without any need for submissions from the parties, that it is inappropriate for him or her to sit on the case. It is only necessary to disclose the relationship if the judge is not prepared to excuse him or herself from the case on his or her own motion. See http www. ManualsVCPMindex. Given that you had private communication with Kerry Stokes, Justine Munsie and barrister Sandy Dawson I am sure you will be happy to respond to my questions. How many times have you been instructed by Justine Munsie when you were a barrister When was the first time you met with Justine Munsie How many times have you met with or spoken to Justine Munsie When was the last you spoke to or communicated with Justine Munsie Do you regard Justine Munsie as a friend Given that you knew it was clearly a breach of the barristers rules and many common law precedents to have a hearing with barrister Sandy Dawson, why did you do it What was the benefit to youWhy did you hear the matter given you had a personal interest in the matter Why did you hand a down a favourable judgement for the applicants during the course of the private communication when it was clearly a breach of the law Why did you hear the applicants notice of motion in my absence At the beginning of the transcript See attachment it says Her Honour declared that she had been briefed as a barrister in the past by Ms Munsie. No objection to her Honour dealing with the matter. Her Honour requested that the defendant be advised. Clearly there was never going to be an objection given I was not there, so why did you not stop the proceedings then You said Her Honour requested that the defendant be advised. They did not advise me and in fact would not even tell me your name when I requested many times the judges name who heard the matter. What action will you be taking against the applicants for breaching your instructions If you plan on taking no action then why not You say on page 2 of the transcript HER HONOUR Its not a question of convenience, I dont know that its proper for me to hear it, is it  We could wait and see if there is an objection. DAWSON  Perhaps if the matter were to come back for directions tomorrow and Mr Dowling could indicate. Why did you ask Sandy Dawson the question I dont know that its proper for me to hear it, is it. Why did you think it was not proper for you to hear itWhy did you wait until that point to say that Is that an admission Sandy Dawson was the one running the court that day which he clearly wasWhy did you not wait as Sandy Dawson suggested You say on page 3 of the transcript HER HONOUR  At the moment I am not persuaded that there is such urgency to warrant the abridgement of time between now and Thursday. So why did you abridge it then You organised for Justice Hall to hear the notice of motion. What did you say to himAnd how did you convince Justice Hall hear the notice of motion and to override the judgement of Justice Harrison Why did you not hear the notice of motion What was the benefit to you of committing the crimes that you did as outlined above What did Kerry Stokes, Justine Munsie and Sandy Dawson promise you in return for the judicial favoursPlease respond in the next 2.